Thoughts on Prestige Universities and Alternatives

Build alternatives and attack the current institutions with new laws

Recently DEI at prestige universities like HYPSM is doing the rounds. I have a lot of unique experience on this topic, so I’m going to share it. I’m approximately the Platonic image of the victim of HYPSM DEI. I applied in 2019 with a 1590 SAT, top of my class at a large, majority white high school that was predominantly middle and upper middle class (so the median student was probably 105 to 110 IQ, maybe even higher). I had won some state tournaments in debate events, and I also played a varsity sport.

Nonetheless, I was mass-rejected everywhere except for Stanford’s early action round. My parents made more than $200,000 per year, so I received no financial aid. They wanted $70,000 per year, but my parents made less than $500,000 per year, like most parents who make more than $200,000 per year, so we could not afford that. Obviously, the structure of their financial aid was meant to cut out the white upper middle class, the main source of talent ready to enter the upper class, due to favorable Mendelian segregation.

source

How Prestige University DEI Radicalized Me

Really, all I wanted was an affordable, meritocratic university where I would have been surrounded by peers, where peer is defined as a like-minded person, equal in ability. DEI had seriously perturbed my entry into places that historically fulfilled this description, but more than that, it had already destroyed the places themselves. I understood that even if I attended, it would not be the experience I was looking for. Not only would I have six-figure debt, I would be surrounded by non-peers. Most of the students there would be dumber than me, selected for traits I look down on: striver background, non-white race, lack of a social life, and commitment to the soulless grind.

I would have been a minority on my own campus. An extreme minority. The 32% white chunk from the chart above isn’t even fully white, a huge amount of it is Jewish or other non-American ethnicities, while I’m a real legacy American and a Christian. They’re not really a member of my race, and they don’t even worship the same God as me. Why would I even go when the place was already in ruins? Why go into debt for that?

It was upon realizing this that I went from idealistic libertarianism to understanding my homeland had been under attack for quite some time. I became a far-right authoritarian who would support any attempt to reverse what had happened here, no matter how contrary to the liberty of those who were at fault it would be. They were waging a war on my race and class; they spoils of their victories went to those who had nothing but hate for us and everything we had built. Mainly it was the races which were predisposed to Communism: hispanics of the Cuban and Venezuelan variety, Chinese communists, afro-Marxists, Jews, of the type who had led the Bolshevik revolution and written down the doctrine, and even a lot of Slavic imports; there are a bizarre number of Slavs among the international and white demographics, far more than the general “anti-whiteness” of admissions and the national IQs of Slavic countries would predict. The reason why is that they are a Communist race.

And by Communist I mean primitive Communism. Marxism is a temporary instantiation of this evolutionary strategy. Communist races are more hive-like, less intelligent and inventive but individual members are more prone to striving. There is a faux-groupishness really rooted in Godlessness and selfishness. They worship the group in place of God but treat their totem like the Pharisees treated God. They secretly hate their group and wish to get one over on it, but would never blaspheme it in public because they fear its retribution. A Christian loves God with all of his heart, mind, and soul, on the other hand, per the words of Christ (see Mark 12).

This is why if you talk to one of these people, they will resist any open criticism or attack on the system, but focus on exploits that actually work to get one over on it. Appear to worship the system, and cheat on your application in a way that gets Blessings from the System, and you are “successful” and “high status” in the eyes of the communist. It’s the same in China or the USSR with advancing through the Party. And it’s the same in prehistoric, feminine hunter-gatherer tribes. Only the fool openly criticizes the Tribe (like Christ did), the Party, or the Prestige Universities. For what is mightier than these? The Striver Man throws the chicken over his back in public while muttering his empty phrases and advances as a result.

What is being selected for?

Prestige universities still select for above-average capable people, but they now select for the lowest possible type of person among capable people. These people have no morals, no hobbies, and no life. Personally, I hate being around people like that, and at my own firm I would trash prestige university applications from young people in favor of people who attended white universities who demonstrate intelligence on par with HYPSM, through SATs, GPA, and chosen major.

People who lie and game the system are lowly, and this is reflected clearly in their demographics.

No wife material in this picture. Who is even having a baby here before 35?

They are so lowly, narcissistic, and socially unaware, that they call their boarding school (universities are nothing more than upper secondary boarding schools for adolescents aged 18 to ~21, the classical modern age of adulthood) “pedigree.” Yeah no. The heir apparent to the Dukedom of Norfolk has pedigree. You are a low born communist, probably Chinese peasant and do not have pedigree.

Heir to the Dukedom of Norfolk

It’s insane to come into a white country and say you have pedigree because you have a fake piece of paper from a historically white school you gutted with your coethnics.

These are the people saying they have “pedigree” and that that entitled them to elite positions in the United States economy ahead of white well-bred English people who are innately more intelligent than them who decided not to attend hollowed out prestige universities or waste their adolescence on math competitions.

While a white upper-middle class legacy American lacks English aristocratic peerage, he still has superior pedigree to any Chinese immigrant. The proof is that everyone wants to live in the places we build, and we have to keep them out, and nobody wants to live in the places Chinese people build.

You can see that with my blog. All of my ideas create places that experience massive immigration demand from people who can’t upkeep them. Nobody actually likes striving ; I would gut it and the economy would be better for it. That’s how it was 100 years ago in the places where my people lived, and everyone wanted to move in.

And you see this with the schools. White people don’t want to go to HYPSM anymore. I rejected the offer. So did everyone else I know. We don’t like the culture or the demographics. Sadly, our alternatives are too filled with random white people, and are not exclusive enough, but we prefer to be at the top of that over the complete mess that is a HYPSM campus.

What should be selected for?

If we keep doing boarding schools for 18-21 year olds, we should probably build new ones that select for the right kind of high capacity person. Race is a major indicator here; people discuss how race-blind admissions will lead to the campus filling with Chinese people. What if we just do reverse DEI and select for legacy American names first? The only problem with this is that the federal government might not take too kindly to it. But if we keep the MAGA revolution going, that could change.

We should also design our own entrance exam. Ideally, we want to make prepping for HYPSM and prepping for our schools two separate things, so Chinese people have to pick one. We should use our own science, psychometrics (invented by English men of pedigree and maintained through the dark times by people like that) to make the tests difficult to prep for. One way to do this is that we aim to measure g; we rotate the type of g measure we use every year, force in person test taking, and refuse to release past exam questions. Many HYPSM rabble still don’t understand how this works or that it’s possible. They just know how to game the system, they don’t get the principals that underlie it or how to build a better one. Great; let them stay ignorant, we want to exclude them.

Faculty hiring is important. We need to take a radically exclusive and visionary approach. Faculty demographics should resemble 19th century Cambridge; we must be vigilant about race, background, and ideology. Any statement of 20th or 21st century leftist ideology is a black mark, as is any association with legacy institutions like HYPSM, as well as any deviation from our ideal racial and class background. A nincompoop like Chris Rufo would immediately go about hiring old leftist Jews with far too much time spent in the current system who have the occasional contrarian opinion, and would be shocked to find that the project fails because it can’t distinguish itself positively from the rest of the system.

It will help immensely to axe most departments. In the beginning we will only have mathematics, physics, statistics, sociobiology, engineering, computer science, and a single, small humanities department which is directed by the sociobiologists. Our dogma will be evolutionary hereditarianism; the null hypothesis is that man is an animal who obeys evolved instinct. His behavior and his evolution can be described mathematically. Humanities can only be understood in this framework. Disagreement with the null hypothesis that is not based on firm evidence leads to cancellation; you can go be a baseless blank-slatist at HYPSM if you like. Evidence that challenges the ethos of the null hypothesis is subjected to severe doubt and scrutiny, because our prior is so contrary to it, like how HYPSM reacts to evidence against blank slatism.

We keep the undesirable student away by our curriculum. Every student will learn a healthy portion of mathematics, physics, and sociobiology. This will keep 120 IQ people who grinded their way up to a 140 IQ score out, because the school will be too challenging for them. They need to major in something fake at HYPSM.

This may filter out girls which is an issue. I propose having a boy’s and a girl’s college. This would ensure a good sex ratio while keeping away the undesirable who adhere to dogmatic gender equality ideology.

All that is left is the economics. To start such a university, we require seed funding, and ideally some based firms who will recruit out of the university. This will attract boys who are aligned with the ideals and see it as a good place to begin a career, and successful boys will attract high quality girls who want to date and marry the boys. Every single male graduate will be well educated in STEM and sociobiological humanities, a very desirable combination. Hopefully, most will also be married or engaged. The secret to our campus culture will be dating. If this can be pulled off, we will outbreed HYPSM rabble, and the prestige of our university will explode, because boys and girls will see it as a place not only to prepare for the economy, but also to find love.

This combination of mating and education as well as selection on true pedigree will produce extremely desirable employees and leaders, since marriage changes men and makes them harder workers.

As for how to induce a good dating culture, I have secrets on that as well. First, we require effective physical education of males so that all of them are in good shape. Second, we attempt to induce an age gap between the girl median and the boy median.

An average age gap of 0 is not optimal for a dating culture. It means girls have less attraction to boys who entered as the same time as them, but their older classmates are less able to commit because they will leave sooner. Considered alone, the girl group could frankly be at the normal secondary level while the boy group would be normal university age. In modern parlance that means we run a large girl’s high school alongside an all male university. This would further justify a curriculum difference, although the high school could be accelerated such that the girls graduate with bachelor’s degrees in feminine subjects to conform with the current credentialist system. Perhaps in the upper years they take courses from the faculty of the lower departments at the university.

This would set our median age gap at 4, and give us a range of 1 to 8. Sadly, at the upper end, this could become illegal in every US state. The minimum age of consent is 16 generally, with close-in-age exemptions up to 5 years extending down to 14 year olds. That means our youngest girls with our oldest boys could lead to rabble interference with our dating culture design. To fix this, we either take enough power to design our own law on this issue, or we compromise and build the school in a polity where the age of consent is 16, and we have a minimum entry age of 16 for girls, inducing a ~2 year median age gap with a range of -2 to 6, considering that they stay 4 years. The girls can be granted high school diplomas in their first year and then study for 3 year bachelor’s degrees.

-2 to 6 covers this curve better than -3 to 3.

Clearly with enough seed funding, this system can be designed and will become highly superior to the present one. The main limitation is lack of human capital; due to dysgenics, we may not have enough people to fill such a system. Indeed, that may be why our old system degenerated to its present state. If we lack enough human capital, it may be better to attack the university system as a whole. There is no point to degrees now that we have the internet.

We could simply induce a Republican congress to pass an act forbidding education discrimination in hiring. Rather, recruiters must discriminate on job-relevant skill. Their pseudo-pedigree has now become illegal and the demand for their shithole universities where everyone wants to jump out a window just lost all of its substance. You recruit from “targets”? Sued & destroyed. We find out you filter for brand name universities on resumes? Sued & destroyed. We don’t like the lack of SEC representation in your firm? Sued & destroyed. With enough MAGA power, we can accomplish this. It’s DEI for state school grads.