The Narcissism of Asian Immigrants

Foreigners don't determine status in a country

Previously I discussed why white elites should support Asian demigration because they cheat all the time. When they’re not literally cheating, they’re still implicitly cheating, because their grind culture is itself a form of game theoretic defection, a poison in their own countries, and a poison for the West. This is because while a white adolescent might work on scientific invention or art, the Asian adolescent studies for a math test. The only result of the math test is a test score. Whether the test score is high or low means nothing for his neighbor or country, while the fruit of the white adolescent’s creativity has a positive expected value to improve the broader world.

Thus, striving and grinding is selfish and defective. But Asians seem to think it actually makes them superior. More than that, they seem to think they’re entitled to speak European languages on Twitter and live in white countries even though these are not their languages, their letters, their countries, their internet, or their website. More than that, they think they get to steal these things and then become the arbiters of status in the white world.

White people built everything the Asian narcissist uses to prop himself up. White people invented his oh-so-esteemed HYPSM “pedigree”. There are no good schools in China. White people invented the letters he uses to express his narcissism on Twitter. His people invented boxy characters which you will find on the Chinese internet. White people invented the website he posts on to tell white people how much better he is than them. Asians copied it and did it worse. Even their little narcissistic peasant ideology is copied from white people. Marx spoke German.

Now let’s view some examples of Asian immigrant narcissism.

Garry Tan obtusely misses the point that striving is selfish, defective, and that if you set whites and Asians at equal levels of strive, whites will outperform. It’s just that whites strive less because they have more cooperative genes. Whites don’t believe Asians are too good, we believe they are cheaters and meta-cheaters and they exploit our system too much. If we believed they are too good, we would move to Asia. Rather, it’s Asians who move to white countries, thus proving by revealed preference that Asians know that whites are better than them, and they narcissistically lie about it to get ahead.

And this is very common behavior in Asia actually. It’s related to “face-saving” behavior. Asians are generally two-faced and deceitful when it comes to talking about reputation. They will do anything for good reputation and they are very cruel to people who do not go along with conventional reputation systems. I know this from learning about Japanese people. What is worse is that Japanese people are the whitest Asians. We are largely dealing with Chinese people whose country is much shittier than Japan and whose behavior is far worse. Most Japanese people would agree with whites on this fact.

Garry Tan should go back to China if he hates white people so much. He won’t because he needs white people to grift at Y-combinator. Only white people are tolerant and open enough to allow a grift like his and to supply original start up ideas for him to grift off of. The CCP would have arrested him for crimes against the proletariat and in other Asian countries he would get no startups because they have none, due to being too busy grinding Contest Math in Hagwon.

Diane Yap’s comment is a bit less gregarious but still a lot less than what any Asian in the US should say, which is that “I’m so glad to be here, I love white people, and I’m sorry we strive so much. We should do better to assimilate. We really want to boost the economy here and help make America out-compete Communist China, because we love Western and American values so much more than Communism and Confucianism.”

The fact is that Yap’s second sentence is incorrect. Asian grinding inflates their SAT scores by at least 150 points. An Asian 1570 is like a white 1420, while a white 1570 is like an Asian USAMO higher-performer. This isn’t affirmative action, it’s measurement invariance with respect to race on g. Asians have a lower intercept in the function that maps signal to g. They have a lower intercept because more signal means less g than whites. That’s because the cheat to get the signal, either explicitly by cheating on a test, or implicitly by preparing much harder than any white.

If you ban grinding, it’s probable that rank order within race won’t change. But rank order between race will change. Asians would only compose about 10% of a meritocratic Harvard class, instead of >50%. Their mean SAT scores would fall below whites. We know this because we know whites have more innate intelligence due to more unfalsifiable signals thereof, like Nobel prizes, inventions, and strong national economies. Where English IQ is set to 100, the ungrinded Chinese IQ is likely 95 to 97. With grinding they score between 100 and 102.

The narcissistic immigrant here first feels entitled to define good school in a country that is not his, while his country has no good schools (China), and then use his own definition to insult me. The narcissism is unbelievable. A foreigner coming in to the country of me and my ancestors and speaking at me, determining what the status hierarchy of my own country will be, as if he had full authority, and in such a way as to put himself at the top. He, a foreigner, on top of his host country, by his own decree. Truly delusional narcissism. Imagine a white person acting like this in Japan.

Good schools are wherever smart whites go, by the way. That means southern colleges now. I got into Stanford, but I did not want to live in San Fransisco, and attend a diverse university. They also wanted $70k/yr because my parents make six figures. The college savings they generously stored for me were one quarter of the four year tuition cost. Needless to say, they could not afford to shell out $210k over three years on top of other expenses, and I couldn’t stomach six figure debt. Not when I had a full-ride scholarship to a well-ranked public university in a conservative Southern state. Stanford is for brown people and poor people. In other words, it’s low status. A minority are legacy rich people. That they would prefer to be around a campus that is 75% brown and poor instead of finding people like me who come from the upper middle class, who are smarter than their parents due to Mendelian segregation, and are therefore well-bred entrants to the upper class, marks them as stupid, degenerate, and ripe for downfall. Many are noticing just how dumb the old Caucasian wealthy class is, compared to the new crop of Zoomer online geniuses. In the end, intelligence will win, and these silly grifters will find their late 20th century windfalls (which they can never explain how they got or why they deserve them) depleted, and they will be back where they belong.

I would like to end on a statement that I don’t hate Asians. I even have some Asian friends! I have no black friends, probably because of intelligence assortment in social relationships. I enjoy a lot of Asian culture. I believe the world on net would be worse off without Asians. However, none of that implies that an unlimited number Asians need to have full political rights in a historically white country. Maybe a minority of Asians could integrate, ideally by interbreeding, instead of forming an isolated ethnic fifth column. But there would obviously be a limit to how many can do that, unless whites want to become significantly Asian genetically. And I do not support an enfranchised foreign race within my own borders, any more than Asians want huge, powerful white populations in their countries (they don’t allow us to do that).