How? I showed successively that the influence you are ascribing is likely extremely small (though, of course, further research is needed). What more did you need?
The underestimation of evolutionary effects after just one generation looks to me to be one of the driving factors of the model of epigenetics. I'll paraphrase what you once wrote on the topic. "If epigenetics doesn't lead to changes in intelligence, it's fake."
Has there been any Cognitive/BigFive testing on the China's Wheat-Rice divide? if there were any maybe you could find even more correlations
From the local born analysis code given in the files of the paper:
"Differences are marginally larger among people not born on the farm"
Darwinian effects (which seem unlikely due to the outlined nearly identical environments) predict the opposite of this.
Darwinian selection would have predicted your familial genepool should hav ebeen eliminated, so there may be flaws in that paradigam.
For example, some Eaatern European whore get fucked by a retard, producing a defective Substack commentator.
"Here we are, he's delirious!
"Easy, easy... Everything will be fine."
Your "fourth paragraph" by the way is merely an opinion, not an argument
How? I showed successively that the influence you are ascribing is likely extremely small (though, of course, further research is needed). What more did you need?
Didn't understand half of that. However.
The underestimation of evolutionary effects after just one generation looks to me to be one of the driving factors of the model of epigenetics. I'll paraphrase what you once wrote on the topic. "If epigenetics doesn't lead to changes in intelligence, it's fake."