I remember reading "The revolution must be international and worldwide. It cannot be carried out on a nation-by-nation basis." I was like "okay so it's impossible and you're wasting everyone's time."
The critique is valid but his most interesting points are about how technology cannot solve problems created by technology. About how there is a never ending trend of needing to control more and more just to keep technological society from collapsing. That it essentially has no future according to him
The bombings were a strategy to spread his message, he doesn't need to justify them. Although he has said that he believes that some things are absolutely morally wrong, violence as part of a struggle isn't one of them.
For his biggest aim, he writes in his longer book that it is really to maintain the natural world; the damage to the environment rather than its effect on people is his main qualm with technology.
For Kaczysnki's use of the word freedom, being able to travel longer distances by car wouldn't count, since it is about being free from external control by an artificial body. You might know it more commonly as "negative-freedom vs positive-freedom."
I remember reading "The revolution must be international and worldwide. It cannot be carried out on a nation-by-nation basis." I was like "okay so it's impossible and you're wasting everyone's time."
Classic philosophist moment. 🙄
The critique is valid but his most interesting points are about how technology cannot solve problems created by technology. About how there is a never ending trend of needing to control more and more just to keep technological society from collapsing. That it essentially has no future according to him
The bombings were a strategy to spread his message, he doesn't need to justify them. Although he has said that he believes that some things are absolutely morally wrong, violence as part of a struggle isn't one of them.
For his biggest aim, he writes in his longer book that it is really to maintain the natural world; the damage to the environment rather than its effect on people is his main qualm with technology.
For Kaczysnki's use of the word freedom, being able to travel longer distances by car wouldn't count, since it is about being free from external control by an artificial body. You might know it more commonly as "negative-freedom vs positive-freedom."
Aren't most of self-reported happiness scales pseudoscience?
Take your meds pls. I know many of your types and ya'll are schizos. Imtheimprobabledreamer blocked me on instagram